Randy R wrote:
This is how every post started by a FP person about a WT starts and ends.
You lose any value or merit, and any useful information.
Randy not my intention at all wanted to have a dialog on callers and what people thought of this new invention.
I make No bones I have a thing for Bill as do many others, arrogance and the way he treats "some people" is not good business plain and simple. I don't need to feed his ego. Even you can't possibly say that the 3 way cobble hobble was worth the price can you? That unit gave me more troubles than any other by far. His business he can run it any way he wishes, doesn't mean I need to be a part of it. He makes a caller like the rest, I have not found it to be any better than the others, maybe some can say different, I truthfully can not. If it was the "Best" I would use it. I don't see any drop off from using something different.
Avoidance does take place, it seems the more sheepmen you have in area then the tolerance for "ANY" coyote is very low, some different from the cattlemen. Many will tolerate and even a few like to see/hear a few coyotes I don't know of any sheep guys that have a liking for coyotes, this means more pressure from all angles and more open opportunity for others. I tell those who ask where can I call coyotes to go to the cattlemen that is the strong hold, I sure wouldn't spend my time trapping for fur or a calling contest next to or on a sheepmens ground as the coyote densitys will be far lower, if not then I'm not doing my job and the phone will ring. Add in the Grand river grasslands and cattle and you have the perfect spots to call in plenty more coyotes than within 3 miles of "most" sheepmen. I also use other tools when the time is right to be as or more efficant, traps,snares are great tools at the proper times.
I agree locating coyotes helps alot sometimes a guy just don't have the time and then we must rely on our experiance to look at the terrain and where those coyotes "might"/ "should" be. It sure takes time to get to know those areas but the more time the better we all get at knwoing where those coyotes like to hang. Even WS has stated they haven't seen this many squirrly coyotes in the years they have hunted. Years of heavy plane use before my time has caused this issue as well. We had 3 coyotes spaced out a ways all 3 hit a hole before the plane could think about a pass. Comes back to the tolerance level of sheepmen it just isn't there. Probably won't ever be. So many welcome any and all coyote chasers making the pressure applied to the general area higher , meaning higher than my cattlemen.
I agree 100% no value with hand caller sounds on a machine, but why portray this with other makers when they have real live animal sounds? WT isn't the only one to have them ,sure other makers have recorded hand calls but they have real sounds as well and add to them all the time. FP will have more real coyote sounds comming out soon to go along with the 13 or so real coyote sounds they do have and many distress sounds which are 100% real as well. Not to mention in 24 bit. Volume is nice I agree but again test has proven that out, the WT isn't any louder than the compeitions when compairing the same units, and yes FP makes all 3 as well 10,15 and 30 watt Toa units.
FP has newer technology and tooling cost for newer cases that cost, so does advertising if you want to be the biggest then you need to advertise correct? They offer more choices than any other maker and have units in all price ranges. I'm not any part of what FP does as a business what so ever. If I like something I will share that with others.
RandyR I have nothin against your choices what so ever, I know you and a few others like the WT and if it gets the job done that is the bottom line, but it isn't the only thing that will get the job done. Alot of my posting has been good natured ribbing and some serious stuff mixed in, but everyone should use the tools that gives them the most confidance and best results. That goes for Tim too
